Joplin Globe Sounds Off On Missouri Gambling Debate
The post below is an opinion piece from the Joplin Globe. The truth is both Dems and Cons opposed the idea for different reasons. Peter Herschend said he was in favor of the idea if the compromise would stop the release of more licenses for gambling operations in the state. Original Post From Joplin Globe Published July 13, 2007 09:30 pm - Missouri’s anti-gambling legislators have ensured, at least for another year, that huge sums of money will continue to flow over this state’s borders into Kansas, Oklahoma and Illinois, and that casinos in this state won’t attract the high rollers that other states do. In our view: State missing out Missouri’s anti-gambling legislators have ensured, at least for another year, that huge sums of money will continue to flow over this state’s borders into Kansas, Oklahoma and Illinois, and that casinos in this state won’t attract the high rollers that other states do. The $500 loss limit in any two-hour period imposed on Missouri casinos puts this state’s riverboat casinos at a decided disadvantage. It also is costing state and local entities about $110 million annually. We understand that some people oppose gambling on religious or ethical grounds. That is their right. But Missourians wanted gambling. Voters didn’t approve gambling on riverboat casinos because of the loss limitation contained in that original plan. Indeed, that approach now is costing them revenues for state and local governments that could be put to good use on projects and programs benefiting Missourians. While loss restrictions may temporarily cool gambling passions, they don’t keep people from risking their money for a reward on the turn of a card or the spin of a slot roller. Furthermore, gamblers can always venture to another state to place their bets without having to worry about taking an enforced hiatus if they lose $500 over a two-hour period. The legislation lifting the loss limit at Missouri casinos didn’t make it to the governor’s desk. Lawmakers missed the opportunity to correct this situation in the last session. They should take up the loss limit early in the next session. Eliminating this provision would bring Missouri into line with other states and make it more competitive. |
Comments on "Joplin Globe Sounds Off On Missouri Gambling Debate"
The only reason the Senate didn't lift the loss limit is because the bill also wanted to cap the number of casinos in Missouri