Maybe Monday was just a bad day for Sarah Steelman. For her sake, she had better hope it was.

That day the Missouri treasurer and wanna-be governor appeared before the Chamber of Commerce here and gave a speech that ranged from college affordability to Missouri's growing life sciences industry.

After covering the speech, I returned to the office where something unusual happened. The phone started ringing. And ringing and ringing.

On the line were chamber members who had just witnessed the Republican's performance. Their reactions were strikingly similar:She was awful…She couldn't string a sentence together…She wasn't prepared…She made no sense…

And on it went.

This was a largely Republican crowd, mind you, though to be fair, Steelman has taken a pair of positions that are anathema to the chamber.

One is her call for a gradual phaseout of Kansas City's earnings tax, the levy on folks who live or work in the city that makes up 43 percent of the city's general fund.

The other is her opposition to embryonic stem cell research, which is seen as a threat to the city's growing life-sciences industry.

But her positions weren't the central concern Monday. What stood out was Steelman's inability to defend her stands and assertively respond to questions she surely knew were coming.

On embryonic stem-cell research, her response to the never-ending controversy was "to bring people together" — pro-research and anti-research. Get 'em talking. There are positives on both sides, she said.

"That probably sounds naïve to you," Steelman said to a room that didn't disagree.

In response to a question about how the city could get by without its earnings tax, Steelman's response was to drop it …and watch the magic happen. "If you remove that tax, I believe it will stimulate more economic development growth in downtown Kansas City."

On how she'd handle the need for hundreds of millions of dollars to fund needed highway construction around the state, Steelman vowed not to increase gas taxes and to consider setting aside a portion of the general fund to cover highway construction. Never mind that that approach won't come close to meeting the need.

Steelman appeared to be stymied by a question on how she'd approach bi-state relations with Kansas. "That's a good question," she said, before mentioning the obvious need to look beyond state boundaries (whatever that means).

 The good news: On Wednesday, she was in North Kansas City for a news conference to unveil an ethics package. No other reporters showed, so I was her lone audience.

There, she outlined and defended a sound package, which included the idea of making "purposeful" violations of ethics law a felony instead of a misdemeanor.

She's shown backbone on this issue, and it's a strong point for her.

But if she's going to knock off Rep. Kenny Hulshof in what's shaping up to be a competitive primary, she's going to need more consistency, particularly before audiences of big shots.

***

Speaking of Hulshof, lots of grumbling among local GOPers who say the congressman from Columbia needs to start spending more time in Kansas City.

***

Hang onto your hats. Gov. Kathleen Sebelius told the Rocky Mountain News last week that Kansas just might go for Barack Obama this year. "Is it possible? Absolutely," she said.

Sebelius admitted that the most likely scenario is that Kansas winds up going Republican, but added, "I don't put anything out of the realm of reason, and I do know that Kansans vote across party lines for people they like, or I wouldn't be elected."

Never mind that the last good people I saw out of Kansas, by Rasmussen last month, had John McCain leading Obama 55-34 percent.

To reach Steve Kraske, call 816-234-4312 or send e-mail to skraske@kcstar.com.